T-Mobile San Francisco experience

March 12th, 2004

These measurements were taken at 8am-9am, 3/12/04 using fully charged
samsung e715. One thing that is apparent is that some underground
stations have very good coverage.

T-Mobile GSM (voice) service strength on BART Richmond line:

station measured
between stations underground and above ground tunnels no service
South San Francisco 2-3 bars signal
Colma 2-3 bars signal
Daly City 5 bars signal, 4-5 bars to entrance of Balboa Park
tunnel w/ additional 1bar dead zone about 1/2 mi east from daly city
Balboa Park 1-2 bar signal
Glen Park no signal
24th and Mission no signal
16th and Mission no signal
Civic Center 5 bars
Powell 5 bars signal, but “no cellphone” icon
displayed and no service — maybe AT&T or Cingular network
Montgomery 4 bars signal, but “no cellphone” icon
displayed and no service — maybe AT&T or Cingular network
Embarcadero no signal
West Oakland 3 bars signal
12th St Oakland no signal
19th St Oakland no signal
Macarthur 5 bars signal
Ashby no signal
Downtown Berkeley no signal
North Berkeley 1 bar signal
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Google Reader
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Share/Bookmark

Samsung e715 experience

March 12th, 2004

Negatives:

  • in-service light blinks so brightly at night it lights up room, but
    the phone can be turned face down to hide that.
  • phone crashes when it goes to a big web page (with a lot of text,
    no images). It also scrolls through text slowly in general.
  • (added 7/21/05) LCD display starts to deteriorate after a year – I have two phones, one is unreadable most of the time, the other is still working ok.
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Google Reader
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Share/Bookmark

trackback – and weblog reinvention

March 11th, 2004

This site now has trackback implemented via a mysql
database keeping state on whether trackback ping was successful and a
background process performing pings. It is used here both as a way of
citing references and hooking into prominent discussion.
The
actual site postings are not submitted via a web interface, but rather
imported from text files which are edited with a user-friendly text
editor — the best way I like to edit text. Also, the article URLs
are textual not numerical and have no date component to them. There
is no idea of a separate “permalink” or “/archive” URL for a posting.
This naming convention appears cleaner to me.

I beg that this is not reinvention for the arrogance of ‘not
invented here’, but rather as a learning experience.

See also:

http://www.movabletype.org/trackback/beginners/

  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Delicious
  • Google Reader
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Share/Bookmark

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
This work by Case Larsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported.