Distributed Reviews

Proposal

I propose a technorati-like service:

  • content stays on users personal site
  • extra, minor markup to make it easily indexable
  • centralized search system w/ various ego ranking mechanisms to encourage participation

motivation

  • Want to keep review content on user’s own site. Let user retain ownership of their content and be able to monetize their own content rather than post to a review site and give up copyright ownership.
  • Want to apply this to restaurant reviews, gas prices, product reviews, “micro review” content in general where you have maybe a paragraph of data which may not index well in a page ranked search engine.

enhancements (and problems)

  • some “tags” need to be exact identifiers, such as business address/name (e.g. lalime), product name (e.g gasoline, ipod nano), location (e.g. san francisco bay area).
  • Problem: How can we converge on a correct identifier tag in its various spellings and possible abbreviations? How would a group feedback mechanism work? 43things goals have a feedback mechanism where users recommend one goal (effectively a complex tag) is similar or same as another, presented when a goal is seen.
  • aggregation within the identifier tag, such as averaging of rating, distribution of prices, counting of # of entries (already done)
  • schema built by group concensus (e.g. product name is important, price is important to many users, color, material, atmosphere, type of food)
  • optional inclusion of targeted aggregated content (e.g. “also reviewed by” for a restaurant review, “group opinion” of a business, lowest price) alongside user’s content

    Implementation

  • reviews are tagged, price information (such as lowest gas prices) are tagged

  • for sophisticated users, local databaes info should be served up in crawlable form appearing as individual entries w/ tags.

Motivation 2

  • Unlike flickr and other photosharing sites, want to keep image content on owners site.

Enhancements 2

  • tag method could be applied for images too, like flickr.
  • searched images could be returned in gallery format with thumbnails and actual images pointing to gallery on users site rather than being stored at aggregation site.
  • Browse by user, or by tag, or by user+tag.
  • User could link in other people’s photos into their own galleries(?), ie. “here’s my trip to Versailles and here’s some other people’s view of the Versailles palace.”

Implementation 2

  • images are tagged
Creative Commons License
Distributed Reviews, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.